You need cookies enabled

HEFCE closed at the end of March 2018. The information on this website is historical and is no longer maintained.

Many of HEFCE's functions will be continued by the Office for Students, the new regulator of higher education in England, and Research England, the new council within UK Research and Innovation.

The HEFCE domain - - will continue to function until September 2018. At this point we will close the site entirely and all its information will only be available from the National Web Archive.


You need cookies enabled

HEFCE will be supporting both reviews with evidence gathering and analysis, with sector and accrediting body engagement, and with alignment with the current quality assessment review.

Professional accreditation systems have a crucial role to play in setting standards and supporting continuing professional development. They help to ensure that courses equip individuals with high-quality, relevant skills, provide industry with the skills it needs to meet the demands of a modern economy, and signal this to employers.

These reviews will begin with a targeted review of the accreditation arrangements for computer science degrees, led by Sir Nigel Shadbolt, to ensure that they are fit for the future. This will include examining the evidence around computer science employment outcomes and going back to first principles about the purpose and role of accreditation. The review will lead to recommendations to ensure that accreditation keeps pace with the needs of private sector employers and the IT professions.

A broader review, led by Sir William Wakeham, will work with accrediting bodies and the higher education sector to determine whether there are other STEM degree accreditation systems that would benefit from similar review to ensure that they keep pace with the needs of professions and industry.

Chris Millward, Director (Policy) at HEFCE, said:

‘We welcome the appointment of Sir Nigel and Sir William to lead these reviews, which will ensure they have the expert leadership necessary to command the confidence of accrediting bodies, the HE sector and Government. We look forward to working closely with both reviewers during the coming months.’


Terms of Reference for both reviews

Computer science accreditation review terms of reference

Download the Computer_science_accreditation_review_final_ToR as PDF (162 KB)

Wider accreditation review terms of reference

Download the Wider_accreditation_review_final_ToR as PDF (71 KB)