HEFCE closed at the end of March 2018. The information on this website is historical and is no longer maintained.
The HEFCE domain - www.hefce.ac.uk - will continue to function until September 2018. At this point we will close the site entirely and all its information will only be available from the National Web Archive.
The UK higher education funding bodies have made the final decisions on the operation of the next Research Excellence Framework process, REF2021. The conclusions, which follow a year of consultation, confirm the arrangements for returning research staff and outputs to the exercise.
The publication ‘Decisions on staff and outputs’, together with the ‘Initial decisions on the Research Excellence Framework 2021’ published in September 2017, sets out the broad framework for REF 2021 following the independent review of the REF in 2016, led by Lord Stern.
The decisions published today confirm that key recommendations set out in the Stern review are to be met, while incorporating significant adjustments to the implementation initially proposed by the funding bodies, as a result of extensive engagement with the higher education sector
The recommendations confirmed include the proposal that all staff with significant responsibility for research should be included in the REF. The funding bodies have set out their expectation that, for many submissions, this will include 100 per cent of staff meeting core eligibility criteria. Responding to concerns that contract status alone may not accurately identify such staff in all disciplines or types of institution, the funding bodies have confirmed that there will also be an alternative route available for including staff, whereby institutions can implement a process, in discussion with staff, for identifying who among them has significant responsibility.
The decisions also address Lord Stern’s recommendation that research outputs should be eligible for submission by the institution where they were generated. As a transitional approach, where a researcher has moved, both the institution currently employing the researcher and the institution where the research generated may submit the output. This approach was clearly supported in responses made to the funding bodies’ recent request for views on this issue.
The funding bodies have also taken key decisions on other aspects including the number of research outputs and impact case studies required. These were informed by institutions’ estimates of the numbers of staff in scope for submission.
The decisions also confirm which higher education institutions in England are eligible to participate, as well as further details about open access, the unit of assessment structure, and multiple submissions.
David Sweeney, Director of Research and Knowledge Exchange at HEFCE and Executive Chair Designate of Research England, said:
‘We have listened carefully to the views and comments received during the consultation, and taken them into account. With these decisions about the REF process confirmed, higher education institutions can now move forward with certainty in preparing for REF2021.’
Kim Hackett, REF manager, said:
‘Responding to the feedback we’ve received on key aspects of the framework, it is important that we now seek to incorporate a discipline-based perspective to develop the detailed guidance. I look forward to working with the main and sub-panels on this task in the New Year.