Report 01/72Estates management statistics projectAnnual report 2001
Contents and executive summary (read on-line) DownloadReport ContentsIntroduction Summary results Estates in higher education Key ratios and measures Overview of results Condition, maintenance and functional suitability Total property costs Space provision Residential estate Methodology The 2001 institution report Data availability and quality Definitions Review of definitions in 2000 Future issues Other developments during 2001 Training Analysis by building Survey of space in medical schools Institutional feedback Executive summaryPurpose1. This publication reports on the progress of the estates management statistics (EMS) project during 2001. Key points2. This report was produced by IPD Occupiers Property Databank in association with GVA Grimley, and was endorsed by the project steering group. 3. EMS is now established as the primary source for central estates information. The initiative has produced two years of results for almost 200 performance ratios. 4. Progress in 2001 has been excellent - with higher participation rates, improvements in data quality and enthusiastic support from higher education institutions (HEIs) - enabling the project team to bring forward the main report by four months. 5. Each of the 155 contributing HEIs has received an interactive report on CD, which allows them to analyse their own results and compare them with those of similar institutions. 6. Institutions agree that EMS is an important and useful resource: around 60 per cent of HEIs consider that the value of the information has improved over the last year from what was already a high base. Most institutions find the ability to compare results against their own selected peer groups the most valuable benefit of EMS. 7. Total (revenue) property costs across the UK HE sector were around £1,250 million in 1999-2000. Therefore, an annual saving of 1 per cent in costs is worth around £13 million. 8. Individual HEIs show some significant changes in the costs, structure and utilisation of estates since 2000. At a sector level, the main results for 2001 are: a. 36 per cent of all space still requires major repair expenditure. Maintenance expenditure has increased by around £4 per m² but there is still concern at the scale of the repair backlog. b. Space provision remains very variable, indicating scope for major rationalisation. In particular, support space and academic office space may be areas for examination by individual HEIs. c. Total property costs have risen slightly to around £81 per m², and now typically vary between £66 and £96 per m². d. The median cost of property relative to HEI income is 9.7 per cent, although the upper quartile figure is 2.1 percentage points higher than this. HEIs will need to consider what ratio is appropriate to them, given their estate and organisational needs. 9. The accuracy of comparisons within EMS would be considerably improved if financial statements were more consistent, especially in relation to the distinction between capital and revenue expenditure. 10. The project team continues to work with the higher education sector and steering group to develop and increase the value of EMS in meeting institutional needs. Further information11. HEFCE 99/18 details much of the development work on the project, and HEFCE 01/10 forms the annual report for 2000. There is a dedicated web-site for this project which contains, among other things, the definitions used. The site is at www.opdems.ac.uk. |