Home > What we do > Funding and investment > Specific funds > Catalyst Fund > Catalyst Fund approval process
In all cases universities and colleges should first discuss initial ideas with their institutional team.
The institutional teams can provide guidance on funding policy and criteria and details of our approaches to assessment and approval. This will include the format for submitting formal proposals to the fund.
We require:
We develop proposals with institutions iteratively to refine details, give feedback and suggest changes. These initial stages usually take some months before a proposal can be formally considered, though this depends on the nature of a proposal.
An internal HEFCE Scrutiny Group will assess proposals against the fund’s policies and principles. We will also use this assessment to determine the level of risk associated with the proposal achieving its aims and objectives.
Approval will then depend on the level of risk and the value of the proposal, as follows:
The Catalyst Fund Panel usually meets three times a year. It currently consists of five members and is chaired by the HEFCE Chief Executive:
|
Panel member |
Role |
|---|---|
| Sir Alan Langlands (Chair) | HEFCE Chief Executive |
| Professor Shirley Pearce | HEFCE Board member; Former Vice-Chancellor, Loughborough University |
| Mr Anil Ruia | HEFCE Board member; Director of Wrengate Ltd; Chair, University of Manchester |
| Mr Rob Douglas | HEFCE Board member; Business Advisor, Douglas Associates Ltd |
| Mr Alastair Balls | Chair, Centre for Life |

Page last updated 9 January 2013
Vacancies | Copyright | Disclaimer | Tenders |