Home > What we do > Funding and investment > Specific funds > Matched funding scheme for voluntary giving > Frequently asked questions
The FAQ below covers the essential structure of the scheme, as well as some specific scenarios related to potential donations. We have also set out a more general overview of the principles governing the eligibility of gifts.
Last updated 17 May 2010
This scheme is the first of its kind in the UK, and is intended to promote a culture of philanthropic giving to higher education institutions, which outlasts the duration of the scheme.
The scheme will also help other directly funded higher education providers in England to increase their capacity to raise funds.
Back to topThe benefits of the scheme should be spread widely across the higher education sector.
Back to topThe deadline for response to HEFCE was 30 June 2008.
Back to topNo. We provided illustrative examples, but the downside of asking HEIs to express a preference is that the monetary value of the caps could not be determined in advance.
Back to topWe stated that the level of the cap in tier three would be higher than the cap for tier two but how much higher depended on the number of institutions electing to join this tier. It was possible that institutions entering tier three may have needed to raise a lot more money for match but ended up with less match money than they might get in tier two due to the number of other institutions entering the same tier. This risk is part of entering tier three - more risk, more reward.
Back to topA grant is a financial assistance mechanism a sponsor uses to award funds for specific research studies. The responsibility for the performance of the project rests primarily with the grant recipient, who commits resources to fulfill expectations of the sponsor under specified constraints.
A contract is an award establishing a legally binding procurement relationship between the sponsor and the recipient. It obligates the recipient to furnish a project outcome or specific service that is defined in detail in the written contract, and it binds the sponsor to pay for it.
Funding for research from charitable foundations for a defined piece of work to generate new knowledge in specified areas of intellectual interest, where formal peer review scrutiny is normally involved, is excluded from the matched funding scheme. Generally, these research grants are most frequently initiated by academics through the research office, not the development office.
A gift is a voluntary transfer of money by a donor, made with philanthropic intent. After receipt, the gift must be owned in full by the receiving institution, and the recipient institution must retain complete ownership of any resultant work or project. The donor may not retain any explicit or implicit control over a gift after acceptance by an institution.
Only gifts are eligible for matched funding.
Back to topEligible gifts are donations of cash or shares which are given voluntarily with philanthropic intent for the benefit of the institution. After receipt, the institution must own the donation in full, and any work, project or intellectual property that results. There must be no contractual conditions attached to the donation.
A donor can request that a specific area should benefit from their donation (for example, research, a school or faculty), but this cannot become a condition of the donation. The institution may report informally on the use or impact of their donation as appropriate, but the donor may not retain any explicit or implicit control over it. Neither can the donation benefit the donor - the donor should not receive exclusive information or rights, promotion or sponsorship (indirectly or requested), preferential consultancy arrangements, or any other forms of financial benefit.
Back to topYes. The matched funding scheme aims to help institutions attract new philanthropic gifts but donor integrity is also considered. If pledges made previously turn into eligible cash donations received into the participating institution's accounts from 1 August 2008 they can be counted.
Back to topYes. These are stewardship devices, and they comply with the Gift Aid rules. There is no 'contract' to provide a service.
Back to topYes, unless they are subscriptions that service or benefit the donor (for example, free entry to a gallery, priority bookings).
Back to topYes, the matched funding scheme would match the £400 total. However donors and their employers must be external to the recipient university. Participating institutions cannot ‘match a match’ of any donations from their own employees, and subsequently claim match funds on the total amount.
Back to topYes. For matching purposes the cash value is fixed at the value of the share on the date of donation.
Back to topYes. Income from the following sources will not be eligible for matched funding purposes:
Gifts from any other UK and international trusts and foundations should be included, including grant income from 501(c)(3) registered foundations in North America.
Back to topNo. Donations from initiatives funded jointly by Wolfson (eligible donor) and Wellcome (ineligible donor) would not count for matched funding purposes, on the basis it will be impossible to ascertain what part of a donation could be attributable to which foundation.
Back to topNo. Legacy gifts, realised or not, are not eligible for matched funding.
Back to topNo. Bequests are not match-fundable. The Universities UK publication will be used to inform the wider picture of voluntary giving in the UK higher education sector.
Back to topNo. Only donations of cash or shares are eligible for matched funding. If the donor sells the artwork and donates the income from the sale to the institution, this can be matched.
Back to topNo. Pledges do not count for matched funding whenever they were or are made. As and when they turn into actual eligible donations, after 1 August 2008, they do count.
Back to topNo. Money raised via ticket sales is not eligible for matched funding. This is effectively a contract (payment of ticket ensures entry to the lecture) and not a philanthropic donation.
Back to topA donor can give to a specific department or programme at their chosen institution, and the donor can expect the institution to honour this restriction. If the donation will fund a programme of activity, the donor and recipient may wish to discuss its aims. Recipient institutions also often wish to involve donors informally in the activity they are funding. The donor should not benefit personally from their donation.
Back to topA gift agreement may be written to outline the way in which a donation will be used: it can detail the department or programme the money will be directed towards, informal reporting proposed, and set out the aims of the activity or activities to be funded through the donation. Any gift agreement should not benefit the donor personally, or offer any kind of sponsorship arrangements. Such an agreement should not give the donor any influence over who is granted appointments, scholarships or other awards.
Any gift agreement should be written with the understanding that the donation is a philanthropic gift, given over to the control of the participating institution, although the donor can expect the institution to honour their wishes.
Back to topYes, a donor may establish a scholarship fund. But the recipient institution must select the student.
Back to topProvided that it is clearly understood by all parties that the donor cannot have undue influence, or power of veto, over the selection of the student, and that such power lies autonomously with the institution, we would consider this reciprocal, and the donation would be eligible. But the donor cannot make their sitting on such a board or panel a requirement of the donation.
Back to topNo. The appointment process must remain under the control of the recipient institution and its appointment procedures.
Back to topAs long as the donations are freely gifted to the institution, and there are no benefits to the donor (such as promotional material as part of or included with the prize) then it is eligible.
Back to topNo. The scheme rewards fundraising efforts in higher education institutions by providing discretionary matched funds, and giving institutions the freedom to decide how those funds are best spent. Potential donors might request universities to match their specific gift, but this should not be an automatic expectation.
Back to topIt would be advisable to inform donors of the institution's strategy in respect of how the use of match is proposed.
Back to topReciprocation of donor generosity (such as the naming of a chair, a plaque or acknowledgement via a printed publication such as a newsletter or Annual Report) must be a simple acknowledgement and not constitute advertising or sponsorship.
Back to topNaming opportunities are reciprocation and not benefit - therefore the donation is eligible for matched funding. However if the company logo appears this becomes sponsorship, and will not be eligible for matched funding.
Back to topYes, as long as the naming convention and practicalities rests with the university.
Back to topNo. The use of a company logo (whether directly requested or not) constitutes sponsorship.
Donors should not receive any sponsorship, indirectly or requested, for their donation.
Back to topFor eligibility in the scheme, both types of trusts should donate less than £60 million per annum. Monies offered to an institution must be in the form of gifts. Very large trusts which donate over £60 million per annum are excluded from the scheme.
Funding for research from charitable foundations for a defined piece of work to generate new knowledge in specified areas of intellectual interest, where formal peer review scrutiny is normally involved, is excluded from the matched funding scheme. Generally, these research grants are most frequently initiated by academics through the research office, not the development office.
As a guideline, if the grant is dictated by the grant-making institution (linked, for example, to a call for proposals or made as a direct offer at a set amount to a particular institution), it should be excluded from matching. If the budget is a point of negotiation, or the grant results from an approach to the trust by the institution, then it probably should be included, as long as it meets the qualifying criteria. Please contact HEFCE (matchedfunding@hefce.ac.uk) for advice.
Gifts from individuals for research, and from their associated family trusts, where there has been negotiation between the individual and the university, are eligible for matched funding.
Back to topWe do not wish to prevent people accessing income from fundraising trusts for matched funding purposes. But the scheme aims to encourage the public perception that higher education institutions are worth giving to as charities in their own right, so HEFCE will require any donations made to trusts after 1 August 2008 to be paid into the institution's accounts before any matched funding grant can be released. Funding must be paid into the institutions accounts in the same financial year that it is received: that is, any donation made between 1 August 2008 and 31 July 2009 must be moved into the university accounts in this same time period. Donations made to the trust before 1 August 2008, even if transferred after this date, will not be considered eligible for match funding.
Back to topTrusts which are consolidated into the HEI's accounts are considered to be part of the HEI, and therefore monies raised are eligible for matching.
Back to topTrusts used solely for the purpose of tax efficiency do not comply with the general aims and criteria of the voluntary giving scheme. Therefore these assets would not qualify for matched funding.
Back to topNo. This is a research contract and therefore ineligible for matched funding.
Back to topNo. This is a research grant and therefore ineligible for matched funding.
Back to topNo. Any intellectual property rights, including commercial value, should remain the property of the university.
Back to topNo. This award is conditional to a specified individual, and does not allow the institution discretion in the use of the funding.
Back to topResearch contract funding is ineligible, but philanthropic gifts are eligible. Large trusts donating over £60 million per annum are excluded from the matched funding scheme, so it would depend on the trust in question.
Back to topUnrestricted cash gifts to support research are eligible for matched funding.
Back to topOnly Gift Aid earned after 1 August 2008 is eligible. This should be the gross expected value of a donation at the time of the claim. Matching will apply to gifts once Gift Aid is included.
No.
Back to topThe Ross-CASE data will be used to assess the impact of the scheme in respect of philanthropic donations to the higher education sector. It should be completed by all participating institutions, irrespective of experience in fundraising.
Back to topThe 2008-09 Ross-CASE survey will begin on 14 September 2009, with the closing date for responses on 6 November 2009. Full details will be published on the NatCen web-site. NatCen will write directly to heads of institutions to inform them of the timescale.
Back to topAll queries regarding the Ross-CASE survey should be directed to the NatCen survey team on 020 7549 9584 or at rosscasesurvey@natcen.ac.uk.
Back to topPlease refer to claiming and payment.
Back to topThe matched funding will apply to cash gifts once Gift Aid is included. Gift Aid is not obtainable on the match proportion.
Back to topThe use of matched funding is at the discretion of the higher education institution (HEI) (that is, when and how institutions choose to spend this money is for them to decide). Matched funding can be applied over an extended period with no requirement to spend it all at once.
In terms of accounting, HEIs are free to account for the matched funds however they want internally within their management accounts. For instance, the funds could be placed in an internally earmarked reserve or fund which mirrors the endowment fund. In terms of external financial reporting, HEFCE matched funding is general income, and as such should be reported in the financial statement and accounted for in the year it is receivable.
Matched funding is also paid in the financial years following receipt of the gift, so there is a time lag whereby the gift is received one year and the matched funding received the following years.
HEFCE has not imposed any restrictions, nor require any reporting on the use of matched funds, so there are no constraints (aside from the law and the Financial Memorandum) on how HEIs manage their public funding.
Finance Directors may wish to refer to the BUFDG weekly digest (1 July 2009) 'Accounting for matched funding' where responses from Andrew Connolly, Chair of the BUFDG Financial Reporting Group and Ian Lewis, Head of Finance at HEFCE are posted on the Discussion Board (registration required).
Back to topHEFCE matched funding is unrestricted income, so it is recognised as income in full when received. As this money is not a restricted endowment, the latest SORP does not allow it to be transferred out below the line to create endowments.
It has been clarified by BUFDG that income will therefore need to be included as part of the surplus or deficit for the year, and transferred to the accumulated general reserves on the balance sheet.
For more information, consult the BUFDG Discussion Board (registration required).
Back to topNo. Accruals at the end of the financial year 2010-11 will not count for matched funding. Donations will need to be received into the institution's accounts by 31 July 2011.
Back to topThe profile of payments that we announced originally - 11.5 per cent, 31 per cent and 57.5 per cent for each of the three years - was based on the timing of the total £200 million funding being provided to us by the Government, of £23 million in 2009-10; £62 million in 2010-11; and £115 million in 2011-12. The annual percentages were expressed as percentages of the total £200 million (£23 million = 11.5 per cent; £62 million = 31 per cent; £115 million = 57.5 per cent).
So had the sector received eligible gifts in 2008-09 that would trigger matched funding of £200 million, we would have still pay out £23 million but it would have been 11.5 per cent of the eligible amounts.
The letter sent to universities and colleges alongside the first payment in February 2010 said:
'Your February payment from HEFCE is [amount of payment]. This amounts to 37.6% of the total match for your first year's claim, based on your tier. It was originally anticipated that HEFCE would pay out only 11.5% of eligible match against the first year of the scheme: this was based on the amount of funding available for the first year compared with the scheme total of £200 million. The higher percentage reflects the funding available as a proportion of the actual eligible funding raised in the first year. Further payments will be made across the next two years up to the maximum for your tier, which will take account of the first year's payment.'Back to top
This depends on the total eligible, giving up to and including those years that qualifies for matching. If the eligible giving for 2008-09 and 2009-10 in aggregate is, say, £150 million , then the £62 million paid out would be around 41 per cent; if the eligible giving for 2008-09 and 2009-10 in aggregate is, say, £250 million , then the £62 million paid out would be around 25 per cent.
The cash amount being paid out is unchanged (£62 million in February 2011) but the percentage will vary depending on the total of eligible giving for the sector.
For the final payment in February 2012 we will pay out 100 per cent of the cumulative eligible giving over the three years, less the amounts paid in the first two years.
Aggregate payments for all years to any institution cannot exceed the cap for their tier.
Back to topDownward tier movement is not permitted. Capacity for upward tier movement will be analysed in the final year of the scheme.
Flexibility will depend on compensating changes to other higher education institutions so the scheme stays within budget overall. Institutions therefore should not plan to move up a tier, as no guarantees can be made.
Back to topWe will illustrate this by using the example of an over-ambitious institution electing to join tier three, capped at £2.75 million, but who are clearly not going to meet anything like the £8.25 million needed to get the £2.75 million match. Resultantly they would just receive the annual 11.5 per cent, 31 per cent, and 57.5 per cent payouts of match on a 3:1 basis of what they have raised. Only upward movement of tiers will be considered at the end of year two. Therefore, institutions are strongly advised to remain realistic when choosing the most appropriate tier.
Back to topNeither HEFCE nor the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills intend to publish institutional data.
Back to topPayment of year 1 matched funds (11.5 per cent) will be made by the end of March 2010.
The actual claims for matched funding income for 2008-09 (the first year of the scheme) will be made via a separate return form. The completed return form must be certified by the institution's Finance Director prior to submission to HEFCE.
Back to topThe annual Ross-CASE survey will inform general philanthropic trends across the higher education sector. The return form will inform HEFCE of an institution’s eligible philanthropic fundraising totals for 2008-09, to enable calculation of matched funds for the first year of the scheme. The return form, unlike the Ross-CASE survey, is certifiable and auditable.
Back to topYes, but Gift Aid amounts due at 31 July 2009 must relate to gifts actually received during the financial year ending 31 July 2009.
Back to topNo. Transitional relief is not eligible for matched funding.
Back to topTo inform the Government how philanthropic giving to higher education has been effected by the matched funding scheme.
Back to topThe Finance Director must, on behalf of the institution, certify the completed return form prior to submission to HEFCE. Certification confirms that:
The certified completed return form should be submitted electronically via the HEFCE extranet by no later than 1700 on 20 November 2009.
The original copy of the certified completed return form, signed by the institution’s Finance Director, should then be sent to HEFCE to arrive by 1700 on 4 December 2009.
Back to topThese deadlines are fixed and non-negotiable, as late submissions would result in a delay in payment of matched funds for all institutions.Institutions not meeting both these deadlines will not receive their matched funds for year 1 of the scheme.
Back to topA sample of institutions from all tiers will be selected annually for audit. Institutions selected for audit of their data returns of matched funding income for 2008-09 (the first year of the scheme) will be informed early in 2010.
Back to topPlease contact matchedfunding@hefce.ac.uk in the first instance.
Back to topPage last updated 22 July 2011
Vacancies | Copyright | Disclaimer | Tenders |